Public Legal Abuse Act (Pro Se Abuse)
(Draft)
Introduced By:
Tim Shilling, Christian Stahl, Wanda and Rymir Satterthwaite
An
Act
AN
Act to prohibit courts, attorneys and others from imposing legal abuse on the
Public or Pro Se litigants which deprives them of their constitution rights, 1st
and 14th Amendment, etc. of fair due process to ensure their rights
have not been violated in family, civil and criminal court.
WHEREAS,
no litigation will be concluded on fraud, mispresentation or lack of fact
finding and due processing; litigations where imposing of fees or sanction must
be fully litigated with discovery and fact finding before becoming final.
WHEREAS,
millions of innocent citizens have been violated knowingly by the court because
they are Pro Se. Pro Se persons are in
the public and public pays the taxes;
WHEREAS, The public who have been abused in the legal
system by an attorney, judge, staff knowingly by violation their constitutional
rights such as 1st and 14th
amendment.
WHEREAS ,
all persons who are sanction and/or place in jail must have had discovery, fact
finding of some sort of hearing to confirm these matters with compete accurate court
record.
Be
It Entaced by Legislation of the United States of America:
Section 1.
Any person who violates a person rights after having time to correct their
error but does not do so will be investigated by separate Federal Public Legal
Abuse Committee.
Section 2. Any person who violates a person rights to
fairness in a court of law will be sanction and removed from office.
Section 3. To
seek an independent Board who will provided oversight of “Oath Breakers”. To review files for accuracy and authenticity
and report on these findings to agencies necessary and public.
Section 4. Add a penalty clause in Title 42
for violation of a judge's oath of office and back it up in Article V of the
Pa. Constitution.
4.1 Add a government immunity exception
to allow citizens to sue for injunctive and declaratory relief. Abolish per curiam orders. Make judges
sign orders.
Section 5. Remove discretionary language from
the code. For example instead of a judge may a judge shall.
5.1
Abolish campaign finance
contributions from lawyers to judges. Judges are funded by the lawyers
who appear before them. This is sort of like having the tobacco industry
solely fund the FDA). Abolish "retention votes" make judges run
for office.
Section 6. Put video in the courtrooms and
allow public access and allow parties to Seal Records when allegations of crime
arises.
Section 7.
Electronically publish decisions, statistics and judge/lawyer
associations. For example a Judge
who is running for retention but there is no record of her rulings
published anywhere.
Section 8. Take Judicial Discipline out of the Judiciary
and put it with the Ethics Commission. End
the Senior Judge program, make them retire.
Section 9.
Reform family court and enable pro se litigants to get answers that is
accurate and right. The complexity of the law should not require a lawyer.
Section 10. Make all family court orders immediately
appealable as of right (interim, temporary interlocutory orders allow and
engender abuse). Review what shakes out of the courts for a year and see where
further improvements could be made.
Section 11. Take “conflict” out of custody (HB
1397 presumption is of shared custody).
Also,
take “conflict” out of support but base it on need after a person's reasonable
expenditures: (rent, mortgage, car, food, clothing, a few discretionary
dollars) and ACTUAL earnings not theoretical "earnings' capacities.
Section 12. Abolish Title IV - D and E - this is
an incentive for bad behavior. The DRO needs to be shuttered. Some Counties
are manufacturing imbalanced outcomes to generate child support reimbursement
incentives. Family asset fleecing and forfeiture.
Comments:
Paternity
- expedite and map it to the actual parent. Married men have had a rude
awakening in the courts when they learned their wife cheated on them making
children they thought was theirs or in some cases they knew they weren't
leading to divorce only to find out the courts consider any child born in a
marriage theirs.
We
know of a fellow who was a truck driver who fell behind in child support.
They revoked his driver's license. He could not find employment that paid
as well. They insisted he pay like a truck driver. They took his
child. They threw him in jail again and again. They extorted his
family and friends. He sat handcuffed in a holding cell for 3 days
eventually bailed out again. Politicians are all well aware of what
is going on and must take action.
