"Female, being subject to laws of the state, in this case personal jurisdiction through property ownership, and contrary to the rule of law, the other party, a male, not subject to these same laws when he undeniably has property and thus personal jurisdiction as well, minimum contacts? He [S.C] has residential property in the governing state. Male party seeks to avoid the demands of the complaint which caused damages to the female party and all ruling thereafter were all based on the fraud upon the court which was discriminatory in nature. Here, the Court abandons good sense with respect to the equal protections in that, the female and less monetarily situated person is held to a higher standard of jurisdiction as compared to the male who is held to a lessor standard of jurisdiction, which amounted to no personal jurisdiction being attached."

https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2137462443392/new-jersey-appellant-court-appears-to-abandon-the-rule-of-law-when-it-gives-full-faith-and-credit-to-a-void-order-in-high-profile-case-involving-rymir-and-wanda-satterthwaite-along-with-dr-lillie-coley